Rubber-Stamped and Ready: FIFA’s World Cup Deals Under the Spotlight

In a year when nearly half the world’s population has exercised their democratic right in national elections, it might seem fitting for FIFA’s 211 member associations—outnumbering the United Nations—to have their own say. But when it comes to choosing the hosts of the 2030 and 2034 men’s World Cups on December 11, democracy takes on a rather unique flavour.

Instead of a competitive vote, FIFA has presented its member associations with one option for each tournament: the coalition of Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Spain, Portugal, and Morocco for 2030, and Saudi Arabia for 2034. The decision will be made “en bloc” via a standing acclamation—clapping, essentially—conducted online.

For those hoping for a more robust process, this is business as usual for FIFA, where democratic gestures often serve as window dressing. Former general secretary Jérôme Valcke once candidly stated, “Less democracy is sometimes better for organising a World Cup.” That sentiment appears alive and well.

FIFA’s Saudi Focus: World Cup Deals and Club Tournaments

While Saudi Arabia’s confirmation as the 2034 host is all but certain, FIFA’s immediate challenge lies with its expanded Club World Cup, scheduled to debut in the United States next July. The 32-team format, designed to rival the Champions League in scale, has been a tough sell to broadcasters and sponsors alike.